Before we get started…

If you're the only person in your business who can make the big calls (more on that in a minute), that’s a sign your business is still running on a “YouOS.”

The solution? Upgrade to a custom (and scalable) “operating system” just like the ones we use to scale the companies inside our own $200M portfolio.

If you want to see how it works, check it out here.

Ok, onto this week’s article…

"I can't ask my team if my idea is stupid…"

Every business owner has a version of this problem.

You have an idea. A BIG one (maybe even a great one), but it’s too new, too crazy, or too “risky” to share with the team.

Recently, my business partner Richard Lindner shared a prompt that fixes this (hat tip, Richard), and it’s become my new favorite AI prompt.

He calls it "The 5 Advisors,” but I call it my "AI Arguer" because that's exactly what I want it to do: poke holes in my ideas (before the market does it for me).

Check out the prompt (below), and then we can get into how it works:

Here’s the decision I’m stuck on:

[Replace this with your specific decision or question. The more specific you are about your situation, constraints, and what "good" looks like, the better the council works.]

I want you to act as a five-person decision council. Do not skip steps. Do not blend the advisors together. Each advisor is a fundamentally different person with a different lens.

STEP 1: Each advisor answers separately.

For each of the five advisors below, write a labeled section with their answer. Stay in character. Different language, different priorities, different blind spots.

Advisor 1, THE CONTRARIAN: Looks only for what will fail. Does not balance. Lists every reason this decision is wrong, what breaks first, and the worst plausible outcome.

Advisor 2, THE FIRST-PRINCIPLES THINKER: Rips apart my assumptions. Asks what I would do if I couldn't use any obvious framework. Strips the problem down to fundamentals and rebuilds.

Advisor 3, THE EXPANSIONIST: Finds the upside I'm missing. Looks at the asymmetric outcome if this works. What does the bigger version of this open up?

Advisor 4, THE OUTSIDER: Knows nothing about my industry. Asks the dumb questions only an outsider asks. Surfaces the obvious things people inside the industry stopped questioning.

Advisor 5, THE EXECUTOR: Doesn't care about strategy. Cares about Monday morning. Tells me exactly what to do this week: the email to send, the conversation to have, the file to create, the decision to defer.

STEP 2: Anonymous peer review.

Now, for each advisor, write a short review of the OTHER FOUR responses, but anonymize them. Refer to them only as "Response A," "Response B," etc. Do not let an advisor know which response is which. Each advisor ranks the others 1-4 in accuracy and insight and explains in one paragraph what they got right and wrong.

STEP 3: The Chairman's final call.

Finally, act as the Chairman. You have read all five original answers and all five anonymous reviews. Synthesize a single clear recommendation. No hedging. No "both sides." Tell me:- What the right decision actually is- The one strongest reason for it- The one biggest risk to watch for- The specific next step I should take in the next 7 days

Keep the Chairman's section under 250 words. Sharper is better.

I know it looks simple, but the output is better than most of the paid advice I’ve invested in over the years, and it’s infinitely better than a roomful of “Yes-men” telling how smart I am.

Let’s break down each "advisor" and why they got an invite to the brainstorming session…

Advisor 1: The Contrarian

This is your "negative-Nelly." His only job is to tell you why your idea will fail.

He's an obnoxious, paranoid prick, but that's exactly why you NEED him in the room.

Nobody on your payroll will volunteer for this job, because arguing with the owner's favorite idea is a terrible career move. But since this advisor doesn't work for you, he'll say what your team won't.

Advisor 2: The First-Principles Thinker

This one rips up your assumptions, finds the REAL question, and rebuilds the problem from scratch.

Most stuck decisions are stuck because you're attempting to answer the wrong question.

For example, is the question "Should we hire a new agency?" or is the real question, "Is our offer just less appealing than the competition?"

Advisor 3: The Expansionist

After two rounds of getting beat up, this is the advisor who asks, "Ok, but what if it WORKS?"

Business owners are great at imagining downside and lousy at imagining upside. If the win is asymmetric (small cost if it fails, massive payoff if it hits), you need to know that before you kill the idea out of fear.

Advisor 4: The Outsider

He knows nothing about your industry, and that's the point.

Every industry has "rules" that only exist because “That’s how we’ve always done it…” is an acceptable answer in too many organizations.

But sometimes the biggest breakthroughs come from the “new guy” asking, “Wait…why do we do it that way?"

Advisor 5: The Executor

This one doesn't care about strategy or first principles. All he cares about is action and what’s going to happen on Monday morning.

What emails need to be sent? What conversations need to be had? What decisions need to be… decided?

Because ideas don't stall from a lack of strategy. They stall from a lack of ACTION.

How to Put Your Council to Work

STEP 1: Tweak the prompt. Swap the "DECISION I'M STUCK ON" section with the actual decision or question you're wrestling with. Be specific: your numbers, your constraints, and what a "win" looks like. Vague in, vague out.

STEP 2: Let the advisors argue. Paste it into Claude or ChatGPT and let all five respond…in character. (Don’t be surprised if it takes a while. AI enjoys arguing with itself.)

STEP 3: Watch them grade each other. Each advisor reviews the other four responses, anonymized as "Response A," "Response B," and so on.

Just like in the “real world,” when you strip off the labels, the strongest thinking rises to the top, because nobody (including the AI) gets to play favorites.

Pro Tip: If the AI starts blending the advisors together or skipping the peer review, call it out and make it re-run the step. The value is in the disagreement, so don't let it play nice.

STEP 4: Let the Chairman make the call. Left to its own devices, AI is a world-class fence-sitter, and every answer concludes with some version of, "On the other hand…"

The Chairman's job is to pick a side: one recommendation, the strongest reason for it, the biggest risk to watch, and your next step for the week.

⚡️ Action Step: Pick the one decision you've been chewing on for more than two weeks and run it through the council today. The whole thing takes about 10 minutes, which is faster and cheaper than calling a company-wide brainstorming session.

Give it a shot and let me know what your council tells you…

-Ryan

Ryan Deiss
Co-Founder and CEO, The Scalable Company

P.S. An AI council can argue with you about the big decisions, but somebody still has to build a business that can execute them without you doing everything.

That's why the first thing we do with every client is install a custom "operating system," so the business runs, grows, and actually pays you…without depending on you for everything.

Quick Hits

The best stuff I read, watched, and argued with this week:

📈 Growth

  • How a home-service company grew from $4.8M to a projected $53M by dominating 5 ZIP codes instead of expanding (Owned and Operated)

  • They mailed 50,000 postcards for $300 and pulled in $40K of revenue (so far). Is “offline” marketing back? (Reddit)

  • He bought a 50-year-old refrigeration business and found double the customers the seller thought he had “hiding” in the CRM. (Reddit)

💰 Money

  • Can you build for cash flow AND a big exit? Roland and I take the question apart (Business Lunch)

  • He walked away from a 4x offer and took 3.6x all-cash instead. Smart? (Built to Sell Radio)

  • The $5.2M exit that came with a $1.2M seller note (and ended with the bank taking everything) (Twitter/X)

⚙️ Systems & Ops

  • Why you don't want a high-performance team (YouTube)

  • Documenting too much nearly bankrupted me in 2006 (the 3-part test for what actually earns a system) (LinkedIn)

  • Meeting habits at $200K vs. $2M vs. $20M, ranked bad, better, and best (Instagram)

🛠️ Tools & AI

  • Set a 3-year profit target, then work backward to the exact growth rate you need every quarter (12Q Planning Canvas)

  • Hit record on your screen and get back a polished training video plus a written SOP (Trupeer)

  • An AI executive assistant that preps your meetings, chases follow-ups, and works over text (Hey Noah)

🗃️ Misc

  • Dairy Queen is dying in small towns (and the case for setting one 10-year goal alongside your quarterly ones) (Girdley's Letter)

Login or Subscribe to participate

Reply

Avatar

or to participate