Quick update…
Every month, our Scale & Exit Accelerator clients run focused “sprints” where we design and build a new critical business system together.
October's sprint is called Build My AI Leadership Team.
In four weeks, you'll install your own Brain Trust: an AI CEO, CFO, Head of Sales, Head of Marketing, and five more AI executives…
…all living inside the Claude or ChatGPT account you already use, so there's no new technology to buy or learn.
The catch?
This sprint is for clients only, so if you’re interested you need to apply by Tuesday, September 29 at 5 pm, because the build cohort kicks off Tuesday, October 6.
Ok, onto this week's article…
"My team won't let me…"
I hear some version of that line from clients all the time.
The business owner spots a problem, and comes up with a plan to fix it.
But when they roll out their “grand plan,” their team pushes back so hard that the plan gets abandoned.
What do you do?
Do you listen to your team, ignore the problem, and risk training them that if they push hard enough, the boss will back down? Or…
Do you push through, tell them “It’s my way or the highway…”
…and risk losing the very people you need to execute the plan?
Damned if you DON’T…damned if you DO.
Fortunately, there is a way to avoid this lose/lose scenario, while still implementing the change that needs to happen.
It's a 3-step process I call The 3 Agreements, and it works whether you're changing a process, a tool, or overhauling an entire department.
Here's how it works…
Step 1: Secure Problem Agreement
One of the biggest mistakes we make as leaders is that we spot problems in the business that no one else has seen.
We're "problem-seeking missiles." We don’t just notice problems, we relish the idea of SOLVING problems, so in a twisted sort of way…
…we see problems as a GOOD thing.
But our team members are different. They see problems as things to be ignored, avoided, and even hidden.
To them, problems are a sign that they’re doing a bad job. That the company is failing. That they’re going to be out of work, broke, destitute and living under a bridge.
(Ok, so maybe it’s not quite that bad, but you get the idea.)
So when we point out problems, our people don’t think…
“Yay, a new opportunity to grow, improve, and become an even better business than we already are!”
They think, “Crap, is this my fault? Am I getting fired?”
That's why you have to get everyone to agree that:
There is, in fact, a problem (before you say one word about how to fix it), and…
The problem is no one’s “fault”…it’s just a part of growing and improving the business.
If you don't have problem agreement, you're not going to have open minds on how to solve the problem.
The simplest way to get problem agreement is with a shared company scorecard.
When the numbers are on the screen, you have an objective measure of what's broken, and nobody has to take your word for it.
SIDE NOTE: I broke down how to build one in this issue, and walk through it step by step in this video.
But even without a scorecard, you can still get agreement.
At your next leadership meeting, before you mention any solution, put the problem on the table and ask:
"Does everybody agree this is a problem?"
Here's what that looks like for the problems I see most often:
Sales are slipping. Pull up close rate (or new revenue) for the last 90 days next to the 90 days before that. "Does anyone else think we have a sales problem?"
Your team is buried in busywork. Before you accuse your people of being “inefficient” or even mention the letters “AI,” have everyone list out the menial tasks that ate the most time last week (ex. weekly reports, follow-up emails, copying data from one system into another). Then, add up the hours and ask, "Does everybody agree this is a problem?"
Customers are leaving. Put the cancellations and refunds from the last quarter on the screen. "Refunds and cancellations seem higher than they should be. Has anyone done the math on where our sales and profit would be if we still had all these customers?"
Projects keep shipping late. List your last five projects with the date each one was due and the date it actually shipped. "It feels like we’re missing more deadlines than we used to. What’s going on? Is this the standard we want?"
Margins are shrinking. Show gross margin by month for the last year. "Is anyone else seeing the same trend I’m seeing?"
Everything runs through you. Count how many decisions landed on your desk last week that someone else could have made. "Who else thinks I’ve become the bottleneck?"
Then, listen to how they answer…
If you get, "Actually, that's not really a problem, because…" or "We're already on it, here's what we're doing…"
…then congratulations. You just avoided “fixing” something that isn’t actually broken. But more than that, you’re building trust with your team (and vice-versa), because you’re aligning on a shared problem rather than jumping straight to the solution.
Now, if you do get a clear "Yes," you're ready for Step 2…
Step 2: Secure Solution Agreement
Once everyone agrees that the problem is, in fact, a problem, you can shift into solution-mode.
But (and this is important) you can’t just dictate the solution…
Remember, you saw the problem before anybody else. You’ve done hours of research and considered a dozen possible alternatives before you landed on your answer.
Your team didn't see any of that, so you can’t expect them to be as enthusiastic about your solution as you are.
Now, you might be thinking, "But this is my company. They should just do it because I told them to."
But that's not leading…that's dictating.
So, do you want to be a dictator, or do you want to be a leader?
Here's a better way:
Lay out your solution. Be specific about what you think should happen, who owns it, and roughly when.
Show your work. Walk them through the other options you considered and why you chose not to go down those paths. This lets them follow the same decision-making logic you followed to get there.
Invite them to poke holes in it. Ask for feedback, criticism, and alternate ideas. Something as simple as, "What am I missing? What would you do instead?" goes a long way to creating trust and buy-in. (Also, it’s very possible your team could have a better idea you didn’t consider, or ideas to better your idea. Either way, it doesn’t hurt to ask.)
Take "do nothing" off the table. If everyone agrees there’s a problem, then maintaining the status quo isn't an option. So make it clear that the choice isn’t between doing something or doing nothing. The choice is about which “something” you’ll do.
When the feedback comes back, it'll usually land in one of two buckets:
"What if we did it this way instead?" Great. Seriously consider it. If their version is better, go with their idea.
"I just don't think we should do this." Point back to Step 1. "We all agreed this is a problem. If not this, then what?"
That's why Step 1 is so essential. You can't have solution agreement without having problem agreement.
Step 3: Secure Commitment
Once you have problem and solution agreement, now is the time to demand consensus. (And yes, I said DEMAND.)
I tell my teams that if they still disagree with the solution we’ve settled on, they have three options:
OPTION A: Come to me, we'll discuss it, and hopefully you become a true believer.
OPTION B: Come to me, we'll discuss it, and you can "disagree and commit." That means you've made your concerns known, but as far as anybody else is concerned, you're all in and will do everything you can to support the project as though you're a true believer.
OPTION C: Come to me, we'll talk about it, and you decide you can't be part of the project. Which means you can't be part of the team. In other words, you need to recuse yourself, or quit.
Complaining and undermining is NOT an option!
Once we agree on 1) the problem and 2) the solution to resolve that problem, you either need to get on board or you need to get off the bus.
I know that sounds harsh, but I will not be held hostage by people who work for me, and I will not tolerate open dissent and undermining once I've taken the time to explain the problem, walk through the solution, and open the door for feedback.
And I DO NOT negotiate with terrorists.
You can disagree… you just can't undermine our efforts and expect me to continue paying you.
And if someone doesn't want to be a part of what the team is doing, that's ok.
It doesn't make them a bad person for disagreeing, and it doesn't make me a bad person for wanting to move in a different direction.
It just means we’re no longer aligned, which means we probably shouldn't work together anymore.
Fortunately, in over a decade of implementing these “3 Agreements,” I’ve never had to go there.
My team either fully buys in and becomes as excited as I am (or even more) to implement the change, or they point out something I didn’t see that keeps me from doing something really, really stupid.
What they don’t do is sabotage a change that should take place.
⚡️ Action Step: Pick the one change your team "won't let you" make (or the next one you're about to roll out). Before your next leadership meeting, write the problem down in one sentence and pull the one number that proves it. Then open the meeting by asking, "Does everybody agree that this is, in fact, a problem?" and don't mention your solution until the answer is yes.
Give it a shot and let me know how it goes…
-Ryan
Ryan Deiss
Co-Founder and CEO, The Scalable Company
P.S. The 3 Agreements work A LOT better when the change you're bringing to your team is a good one to begin with…and that's hard to pull off when you're making every decision alone.
That's the whole idea behind October's Scale & Exit client sprint, Build My AI Leadership Team.
In four weeks, you'll install a Brain Trust of 9 AI executives who all read from one source of truth (your company’s operating system). Once it's running:
Monday, 7:00 AM: Your CEO brief is waiting with the three things that matter this week and what to do about each.
Before pipeline review: Your Head of Sales has already flagged the deals going quiet, before they die in the close zone.
Weeks ahead: Your CFO spots the cash crunch while there's still time to act.
Before you hire: Your Head of HR tells you whether you need the hire at all, or a better system.
The catch? This sprint is only available to clients.
So apply for our Scale & Exit Accelerator by Tuesday, September 29 at 5 pm, because the build cohort kicks off Tuesday, October 6.
Quick Hits
The best of what I read, watched, and clicked this week.
📈 Growth
8 businesses to 8 figures and this is still the first book I hand people (Instagram)
A $250K/yr publishing business built on ideas I never invented (LinkedIn)
10,000 email subscribers from one Instagram Reel, plus 6 more list plays (Newsletter Operator)
Why I shut off $150K a month in ads and grew anyway (YouTube)
💰 Money
Jimmy Buffett left $275M and a two-state lawsuit behind him (Business Lunch)
Under $5M in revenue, chasing EBITDA costs you more than it makes (Owned and Operated)
Columbia House went from $1.4B to $17M on profits it never earned (Girdley's Letter)
7x on paper and break even in cash, and what that gap actually cost him (Built to Sell Radio)
⚙️ Systems & Ops
The hire most founders make right before things get worse (YouTube)
The candidate rambled for 22 minutes on one question, and that was the answer (Girdley's Letter)
🛠️ Tools & AI
Give your team the criteria so they stop tapping you on the shoulder (Clarity Compass)
Put the number on a screen the whole team already looks at (Geckoboard)
Record the walkthrough once so your team sees how you got there (Loom)
🗃️ Misc
Michael Jordan won 6 rings and still couldn't run the team he bought (Contrarian Thinking)


